Artist Mark Kratter’s “undisclosed filtering practices” lawsuit against Spotify has gotten very ugly, very fast: Moments after the DSP moved to shift the case to federal court, Kratter has fired back against the “frivolous” request and demanded attorney’s fees for his trouble. We…


IndustryFirst reported 3 jul, 13:05 / 1 outlet
Spotify: what outlets are reporting
Every outlet’s headline for this story described alleged conduct. Le Raver names the subject and links to their reporting rather than restating it.
Single-source story
Digital Music News is the only tracked outlet reporting this. Read it at the source below.
Only one tracked outlet has this. Le Raver links to it rather than summarising it.
Coverage breakdown
1 source
1 original reporting
0 ran the press release
How this story was covered
1 tracked outlet has reported this story, first published 3 Jul, 13:05. Digital Music News published first among the outlets Le Raver tracks. The one report Le Raver has classified carried original reporting. That is 1 of the 26 outlets Le Raver tracks. No other tracked outlet has covered it, so this page links out rather than summarising it.
How it unfolded
- 3 Jul, 13:05Digital Music NewsFirstKratter v. Spotify Venue Battle Intensifies — Artist and Attorney Fires Back Against Transfer Request, Demands Legal Fees